# <!-- METAHEADER
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"*": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wefindx/schema/master/intent/oo-item.yaml"
# <!-- HEADER
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"base:title": "0oo - Critical systems monitoring"
"og:title": "Critical systems monitoring"
"og:description": "The global emergencies, like the pandemic, brings us to think, how to create rapid and appropriate responses to emergencies, while ensuring individual freedoms we enjoy. The dichotomy arises, when we want to create a decentralized system with the resilience guarantees of a more centralized system. This question is closely related to making decentralized systems (e.g., P2P systems), that are as resilient like distributed systems (cloud infrastructures), with centralized monitoring. _The question comes from discussions at Foresight Institute, [HiveMind workshop](https://foresight.org/hive-mind/)._"
"og:image": "https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/28134655"
"og:url": "/intent/1280/"
"base:css": "/static/css/bootstrap.min.9c25540d6272.css"
"base:extra-css": "/static/css/base.57997aeac1df.css"
"base:favicon": "/static/favicon.acaa334f0136.ico"
"base:body_class": ""
"layout:logo": "/static/0oo.8d2a8bbef612.svg"
"layout:index": "/"
"layout:menu": "/menu/"
"layout:categories": "/intents/"
"layout:ideas": "/methods/"
"layout:projects": "/projects/"
"layout:users": "/users/"
"layout:about": "/about/"
"layout:help": "/help/"
"layout:bug_report": "https://github.com/wefindx/0oo"
"layout:login": "/accounts/login/"
"layout:light-off": "/darken/?darken=true"
"layout:set-multilingual": "/mulang/?mulang=true"
"layout:lang": "Язык"
"layout:set-language-post-action": "/i18n/setlang/"
"layout:csrf-token": "DYmLdHAiTwSurla14Nah75tCvIGm7OnUja4hCzFk9kGfnDAlNfKFx9Z7k7bKaGJW"
"layout:input-next": "/intent/1280/"
"layout:languages": [{"code": "ja", "is-active": "false", "name": "日本語"}, {"code": "lt", "is-active": "false", "name": "Lietuviškai"}, {"code": "zh-hans", "is-active": "false", "name": "简体中文"}, {"code": "en", "is-active": "false", "name": "English"}, {"code": "ru", "is-active": "true", "name": "Русский"}, {"code": "oo", "is-active": "false", "name": "O;o,"}]
# <!-- TOPIC
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"item:parent:intents": [{"title": "Reshape Global Governance To Address Global Catastrophic Risks", "url": "/intent/783/"}, {"title": "Information Control", "url": "/intent/1248/"}, {"title": "Экзистенциальные риски", "url": "/intent/1114/"}]
"item:title": "Critical systems monitoring"
"item:votes": 0
"item:add-vote": "#addnote"
"item:intent": "/intent/1280/?l=ru"
"item:base-administration": false
"item:body": |
    The global emergencies, like the pandemic, brings us to think, how to create rapid and appropriate responses to emergencies, while ensuring individual freedoms we enjoy. The dichotomy arises, when we want to create a decentralized system with the resilience guarantees of a more centralized system. 
    
    This question is closely related to making decentralized systems (e.g., P2P systems), that are as resilient like distributed systems (cloud infrastructures), with centralized monitoring.
    
    _The question comes from discussions at Foresight Institute, [HiveMind workshop](https://foresight.org/hive-mind/)._
"item:permalink": "/intent/1280/?l=ru"
"item:source-date": ""
"item:owner": "Mindey"
"item:ownerlink": "/user/147/Mindey"
"item:created": "2020-05-13T09:54:33.859000"
"item:intent:child:add": "/admin/hlog/intent/add/?parent=1280"
# <!-- LINKS
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"item:method:items":
"item:method:add": "/admin/hlog/method/add/?parent=1280"
"item:comment:add": "/intents/addnote?parent=1280"
"item:comment:add:csrf_token": "DYmLdHAiTwSurla14Nah75tCvIGm7OnUja4hCzFk9kGfnDAlNfKFx9Z7k7bKaGJW"
"item:comment:form": |
    <li> <textarea name="text" cols="40" rows="10" id="addnote" class="comment-textarea" required>
    </textarea></li>
    <li><label for="id_vote">Голос:</label> <select name="vote" id="id_vote">
      <option value="-1">[−]</option>
      <option value="0" selected>-</option>
      <option value="1">[+]</option>
    </select></li>
    <li><label for="id_crawl">Тихо:</label> <input type="checkbox" name="crawl" onchange="handleSilently(this)" id="id_crawl"></li>
    <li><label for="id_has_questions">Вопросы:</label> <input type="checkbox" name="has_questions" id="id_has_questions"> <span class="helptext">Mark if the comment raises new questions.</span></li>
    <li><label for="id_has_ideas">Идей:</label> <input type="checkbox" name="has_ideas" id="id_has_ideas"> <span class="helptext">Mark if the comment contributes potential solutions.</span></li>
    <li><label for="id_has_facts">Факты:</label> <input type="checkbox" name="has_facts" id="id_has_facts"> <span class="helptext">Mark if the comment contributes facts for reasoning.</span></li>
    <a href="/accounts/login/">Пожалуйста, <u>войдите</u>.</a>
# <!-- COMMENTS
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"item:comment:items":
  - "id": "r-83"
    "mtrans": |

        Примеры решения этой проблемы могут быть найдены в природе, то есть, как улей реагирует на осу-нарушителя, по сравнению с тем, как комары **, похоже, ** не реагируют коллективно, каждый выступает в качестве независимого субъекта. Муравейник может быть чем-то вроде москита и улья, в котором каждый муравей действует со своей собственной свободой, выполняя какую-то социальную роль, которую он принимает как часть дифференциации, аналогичной сексуальной дифференциации, и реагирует на злоумышленников немного похоже на иммунная система реагирует на патогенные микроорганизмы - сигнализируя определенным типам агентов (муравьи-воины или Т-клетки), и в наших нынешних обществах мы находим людей, которые выполняют роли - врачи, полицейские и т. д.), чтобы взаимодействовать с определенными типами угроз.
        
        
        
        Интересно, что все эти системы основаны на определенном типе распознавателей и сигнализации. Муравей распознает сигналы, подобные феромонам, в то время как в нашем обществе мы можем распознавать различные виды сигналов. Я думаю, что часть решения заключается в разработке алфавита для социальных сигналов и инноваций вокруг социальных ролей. Например, нам может понадобиться сигнал (или символ) и распознаватель возникающих экспоненциальных нарастаний.
        
        
        
        Конкретные идеи таких наборов символов и шаблонов сигнализации могут быть интересны и могут быть предложены в качестве идей.

    "text": |
        Examples of solutions to this problem could be found in nature, i.e., how a beehive responds to an intruder wasp, vs., how mosquitoes **do not** seem to respond collectively, each acting as an independent actor. An ant-hill may be something between a mosquito and a beehive, in that every ant acts with its own freedom, in fulfilling some social role, that it takes as part of differentiation, similar to sexual differentiation, and respond to intruders a bit like the immune system responds to pathogens -- signaling to certain type of agents (warrior ants, or T-cells, and we find people in our current societies that roles -- doctors, policemen, etc.) to engage with certain type of threats.
        
        What's interesting, is that all these systems rely on certain type of recognizers, and signaling. An ant recognizes signals like pheromones, while in our society, we may be recognizing different kind of signals. I'd think part of the solution lies in developing an alphabet for social signals, and innovating around social roles. For example, we may need a signal (or a symbol) and a recognizer of emergent exponential growths. 
        
        The particular ideas of such symbol sets  and signaling patterns may be interesting, and be suggested as ideas.
    "owner": "Mindey"
    "ownerlink": "/user/147/Mindey"
    "permalink": "/intent/1280/?l=ru#r-83"
    "created": "2020-05-13T09:54:47.494000"
    "vote": ""
"base:js": "/static/js/base.c7357c06cc89.js"