# <!-- METAHEADER
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"*": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wefindx/schema/master/method/oo-item.yaml"
# <!-- HEADER
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"base:title": "0oo - User Freedom through Source Ownership"
"og:title": "User Freedom through Source Ownership"
"og:description": "The GNU GPL insures each user is given &quot;at cost&quot; access to the *virtual* Sources of the products they use. Could we insure each user gains ownership in the *physical* Sources of the products they use? We could write a sort of //GPL for the material world// by crafting a &quot;Terms of Operation&quot; designed to protect User Freedom. We could then buy land in groups, held under those terms, to collectively own the Means of Production because we need the results of that production. We could also schedule work early (sign Work Contracts) to solve the barter problem and thereby …"
"og:image": "https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/28134655"
"og:url": "/method/53001/"
"base:css": "/static/css/bootstrap.min.9c25540d6272.css"
"base:extra-css": "/static/css/base.57997aeac1df.css"
"base:favicon": "/static/favicon.acaa334f0136.ico"
"base:body_class": ""
"layout:logo": "/static/0oo.8d2a8bbef612.svg"
"layout:index": "/"
"layout:menu": "/menu/"
"layout:categories": "/intents/"
"layout:ideas": "/methods/"
"layout:projects": "/projects/"
"layout:users": "/users/"
"layout:about": "/about/"
"layout:help": "/help/"
"layout:bug_report": "https://github.com/wefindx/0oo"
"layout:login": "/accounts/login/"
"layout:light-off": "/darken/?darken=true"
"layout:set-multilingual": "/mulang/?mulang=true"
"layout:lang": "Язык"
"layout:set-language-post-action": "/i18n/setlang/"
"layout:csrf-token": "74KZu2Ho4JucPwHOg2Bo4nTUemEWpbe7YtoFACEiFdt5lsTPw5Dsv7GhXUBDvWev"
"layout:input-next": "/method/53001/"
"layout:languages": [{"code": "ja", "is-active": "false", "name": "日本語"}, {"code": "lt", "is-active": "false", "name": "Lietuviškai"}, {"code": "zh-hans", "is-active": "false", "name": "简体中文"}, {"code": "en", "is-active": "false", "name": "English"}, {"code": "ru", "is-active": "true", "name": "Русский"}, {"code": "oo", "is-active": "false", "name": "O;o,"}]
# <!-- TOPIC
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"item:parent:intents": [{"url": "/intent/56001/", "title": "Open Source Hardware"}]
"item:title": "User Freedom through Source Ownership"
"item:summary": "Property Left through Property Rights"
"item:voting": +2
"item:voting:add": "/admin/hlog/voting/add/?method=53001"
"item:voting:csrf_token": "74KZu2Ho4JucPwHOg2Bo4nTUemEWpbe7YtoFACEiFdt5lsTPw5Dsv7GhXUBDvWev"
"item:voting:submit-value-option": {"selected": "[-]", "value": "-"}
"item:base-administration": false
"item:body": |
    The GNU GPL insures each user is given "at cost" access to the *virtual* Sources of the products they use.
    
    Could we insure each user gains ownership in the *physical* Sources of the products they use?
    
    We could write a sort of //GPL for the material world// by crafting a "Terms of Operation" designed to protect User Freedom.
    
    We could then buy land in groups, held under those terms, to collectively own the Means of Production because we need the results of that production.
    
    We could also schedule work early (sign Work Contracts) to solve the barter problem and thereby insure any good or service with full specialization of labor without token passing.
"item:source-date": ""
"item:permalink": "/method/53001/?l=ru"
"item:owner": "Patrick-T-Anderson"
"item:created": "2021-08-19T02:26:24.865724"
"item:ownerlink": "/user/25001/Patrick-T-Anderson"
# <!-- LINKS
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"item:link:add": "/admin/hlog/link/add/?parent=53001"
"item:link:items":
"item:project:items":

# <!-- COMMENTS
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"item:comment:items":
- "id": "a-85001"
  "mtrans": |

    Мне нравится эта идея. Мои друзья создают DAO на основе, кажется, схожих идей. Взгляните на их вступление.
    
    ИИНТРО
    Полуразумный DA👾 использует право собственности на землю и договорное право, чтобы постепенно получить контроль над всеми
    вертикально интегрированные цепочки поставок, необходимые для размещения себя и всех работников, необходимых для выживания
    и размножаются.
    БОТИНОК
    DA👾 ищет землю, подходящую для строительства экологически чистых деревень.
    DA👾 чеканит 1 заменяемую монету EarthChange за каждый фут² земли.
    Затем DA👾 выставляет эти земли на аукционе, чтобы купить эту Землю.
    Общий объем земельного участка ограничен футами земли.
    earthChange не представляет собой право собственности на землю!
    НАЧНИТЕ
    DA👾 теперь выдает товарные билеты в качестве требований к Future Production.
    Затем DA👾 выставляет на аукционе билеты на продукты для подписей контрактов на выполнение работ.
    ЗАПУСТИТЬ
    Вы получаете право собственности на землю по мере выполнения контрактов на работу.
    Землевладение заранее выделяет вам будущее производство.
    РАСТИ
    Владельцы предлагают новые билеты продукта для управления будущим производством.
    Владельцы, продающие излишки, должны «отражать» некоторую прибыль этим пользователям как собственность на землю.
    ВИЛКА
    Подгруппы должны иметь возможность делить Землю (рисовать границы) для локализации контроля.

  "text": |
    I like the idea. My friends are forming  a DAO based on,  seems like, similar ideas. Take a look at their intro.
    
    IINTRO
    The semi-sentient DA👾 uses land ownership and contract law to slowly gain control of all the
    vertically-integrated supply-chains required to host itself and all the workers it needs to survive
    and propagate.
    BOOT
    The DA👾 searches for Land suitable to build permacultured eco-villages.
    The DA👾 mints fungible 1 earthChange Coin for each ft² of Land.
    The DA👾 then auctions those earthChange to buy that Land.
    The total supply of earthChange is limited by ft² of Land.
    earthChange does not represent Land Ownership!
    START
    The DA👾 now issues Product Tickets as claims against Future Production.
    The DA👾 then auctions Product Tickets for Work Contract signatures.
    RUN
    You gain Land Ownership as you fulfill Work Contracts.
    Land Ownership preallocates Future Production to you.
    GROW
    Owners propose new Product Tickets to govern Future Production.
    Owners selling surplus should 'reflect' some profit to those users as land ownership.
    FORK
    Subgroups must be able to divide Land (draw borders) to localize control.
  "owner": "skihappy"
  "ownerlink": "/user/14001/skihappy"
  "permalink": "/method/53001/?l=ru#a-85001"
  "created": "2021-08-19T02:39:32.605579"
"base:js": "/static/js/base.c7357c06cc89.js"
